California Mandates Sexual Harassment Training: What Employers Should Know

The deadline for compliance with California's new law requiring supervisors to be trained in the prevention of sexual harassment is rapidly approaching; employers with 50 or more employees have until December 31, 2005 to comply. And with the recent California Supreme Court ruling that employers can be held liable for a hostile work environment created when co-workers become romantically involved outside of the workplace, employers are taking compliance more seriously than ever before.

So what do employers need to do to comply with the new law? California Assembly Bill 1825 (AB 1825) mandates all supervisors receive two hours of interactive training, to be repeated every two years. Regardless of where the employer is based, any employer with employees in California is obligated to provide supervisors with the necessary training.

Before the December deadline, any person in a supervisory position as of July 1, 2005 must receive at least two hours "of classroom or other effective interactive training and education regarding sexual harassment." New supervisors hired or promoted after July 1 must receive the training within six months.

The two hours may be broken into shorter classes, but employers should be advised that the training required under AB 1825 is "intended to establish a minimum threshold" and that employers are responsible for taking "all reasonable steps necessary to prevent and correct harassment and discrimination."

During training sessions, supervisors should receive information about federal and state law regarding sexual harassment. They should receive practical guidance regarding the prevention and correction of sexual harassment, as well as the remedies available to victims of sexual harassment in the workplace. In order to be compliant, the training must include practical example situations to help supervisors recognize and deal appropriately with sexual harassment.

Compliance with AB 1825 does not, in and of itself, insulate the employer from liability in the event of a sexual harassment lawsuit. Additionally, training in sexual harassment prevention will not defend the employer against claims of discrimination on the basis of race, religion, age, disability, etc.

Statistically, greater than half of employers report at least one sexual harassment lawsuit each year, suggesting employers must take proactive measures to prevent a hostile work environment. Although information on AB 1825 is available from Cal/OSHA, many workplace solutions firms have put together informational packages and online training programs to help employers become fully compliant.

According to Jackson-Lewis LLP in California, less than half of employers have complied with AB 1825 requirements, and fewer still have plans to do so by the deadline. Non-compliance with the law exposes employers to citations and increased liability should a sexual harassment lawsuit be filed.

The cost of compliance with AB 1825, as well as with other harassment and discrimination legislation, is far less than potential losses due to harassment claims and lawsuits, not to mention the negative publicity that can come out of these cases. The deadline is approaching, but employers still have time to follow through. Start planning and training now, and you can achieve your goal of compliance well before the deadline.

Comments

I was contracted by G4S Security on 26 September as DOD School Bus Monitor on Okinawa Japan.
I took MEDICAL EXAMS + INCULATION at ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER at a cost about $ 200.00
took and passed LIFE GUARD TEST $ 35.00
Attended 3 day TRAINING CLASSES, was paid by G4S $ 175.00
I was issued Base Passes on 21 September for Kadena A.B. and Marine corps Bases.
On 22 Sept,Iook 1 day "RIDE ALONG" ORIENTATION( was paid $93.00)
On my return that day, I was given a "WORK SCHEDULE" for 26- 28-29-30 Sept 11
On 23 SEPTEMBER 2011 was told by Mr.Sibley ( Supervisor) I did not qualify for the job and to turn in my company jacket
I REQUESTED "A 30 days written notice as per contract
On 26 Sept. 11 Went to the G4S Office demanding a copy of the contract( ODLY SIGNED THAT DAY)
Mr, Sibley told me "He was waiting on a "STATESIDE SECUTITY CLEARANCE, and after some more training would put me back on SCHEDULE.
On 16 October 11 I WENT BACK TO INQUIRE ABOUT MY STATUS.
Mr. Sibley told me I was put "ON STANDBY" and report within 30 Minutes of his call. " TURN IN YOUR BASE PASSES" i DECLINED TILL ALL APPEALS ARE EZHAUSTED, I handed him an appeals letter. Company Grievance rules.( NO REPLY)
On 28 October I addressed A LETTER to Mr. Hunter(Nr.1) On Okinawa: No Reply
On Nov. 17 I "E Mailed" Mr. Costello ( Nr.2) In Korea H.Q. G4S Far East. IMMEDITE REPLY" He had held up my hiring as THE PARENT COMPANY G4S IN LONDON GAS A MANDATORY RETIREMENT POLICY at age 65 and now are enforcing it here also. I replied their Contract was not with the Brittish but the US Goverment AND THE WERE KEEN ON equal opportunity etc.
On 21 Nov. 11 I "E" Mailed a final PETITION to : Mr.Steve CHON Director with attachments of all previous correspondence and he replied same day: " WHEN MrCOSTELLO GOT BACK FROM AN OVERSEAS TRIP, THEY WOULD ALL GET TOGETHER WITH Mr. SIBLEY,Mr. HUNTER AND DECIDE MT CASE.
I waited till after Christmas Vacation turnover hoping they would contact me. No FURTHER COMMUNICATIONS.
On 27 January 2012 I FILED A COMPLAINT OF "AGE DISCRIMINATION" with Mr BALDONADO, DIRECTOR OF EEOC at San Francisco.
I understand I CAN SUE IN ANY FEDERAL COURT but Okinawa comes under APO AP SAN FRANCISCO so this is in effect the nearest District oFFICE.
i KNOW i can file ELECTRONICALY and downkoaded tons of material,but it looks I might need a lawyer.
Can you help?

Hi Edgard. We are sincerely sorry to hear of your situation. LegalZoom makes creating legal documents easy and affordable, but we can't give specific legal advice on this situation. However, we may be able to help you find an attorney who can assist you through our Legal Advantage Plus plan! Please visit https://www.legalzoom.com/attorneys-lawyers/legal-plans/personal.html for more details.



Please note that we can’t answer legal questions in the article comments. If you have a specific legal question, click here to connect with an attorney.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.