Before you record your first scene as an independent filmmaker, you should know some basics about the law and how to protect your rights. Although there are certainly other legal concerns, the two major areas that you should be concerned about from the get-go are your business structure and your intellectual property rights.
What follows is a short guide on these legal issues to help you as you pursue your filmmaking dreams.
Business Structure for Independent Filmmakers
When starting any new venture, the first question an entrepreneur faces is how to organize the business structure; the same goes for independent filmmakers when setting up a production company.
Generally, for a film production company, you are best advised to set up an entity that will not only divide economic risk, but also allow you to separate your personal finances and responsibilities from those of the company.
Although you may choose a sole proprietorship (just you, no special paperwork required to start), it is not generally advisable for a production company as you cannot spread risk or limit potential liability; that is, if your business ends up owing money, you could be held liable from your own personal assets.
Along the same lines, although a general partnership (you and one or more partners, usually via a partnership agreement) is easy to form because you don't have to file papers with the government, you are not automatically protected from personal liability and can be held responsible for your partner's (or partners') business debts as well.
Accordingly, there are three main types of business structures that an independent filmmaker should choose from:
These may not cover the only considerations in your specific situation, however, so it is important that you receive sound legal advice on this point before choosing a business structure for your filmmaking company.
Intellectual Property Rights
"Intellectual property rights" refer to property rights over creations, including screenplays, motion pictures, sound recordings, and more. The types of intellectual property rights most important to independent filmmakers are those concerning copyright, which gives the copyright owner the rights to reproduce, adapt, arrange, perform, display, distribute, or sell copies of the work, among other things.
Gaining a copyright over a screenplay is simple in that you only must put the idea into tangible form (typing or writing it will do); however, unless you have registered the copyright with the US Copyright Office, you will not be able to bring a lawsuit for damages in the event of infringement. A registered copyright is generally valid for 70 years beyond the life of the author or from the death of the last living author (if there is more than one).
Another note regarding copyright and filmmaking: you should be certain not only to protect your own work, but also to make sure you're not infringing on the copyright of others as you begin a project.
Other Legal Issues to Consider
Remember that as an independent filmmaker, you are likely to encounter many other legal issues as well, particularly those regarding contract and employment law, so be sure to consult an experienced attorney to help guide your decisions—and remember that LegalZoom can help you if you are ready to set up your business and/or protect your work through copyright.
Overall my personal opinion on independent film making is that infringement is a lowdown dirty crime...artists who are poor of thought and who are hired to be "independent filmmakers" by the government and who also hire other people to "act" for the ergonomic efforts and environmental conservation "programs", should at least acknowledge their liability to certain shareholders and release them their rights and royalties. In the areas of politics,science and environmental law...if any one person is ousted from their share of this "public display"/"public interest" it is inhumane and illegal. What "healthy living" is coming from the USDA and the FDA is merely -feeding- shareholders to compromise their integrity and their healthy living standards which goes against the anti-poverty act of 2000. This is actually hypocritical and a violation of human rights....at the end of the day when its all said and done at least restoration of their civil rights would be a fairshare of AMERICA and their civil royalties would be a fair piece of the "pie".... Hiring a "nobody" with a high IQ to work for homeland security is an occupation and so is 'his' job also. Did he really need to be popular or famous or did he even deserve credit for monitoring society from a satelitte for a living????? and now he's an independant film maker...??????? and on top of that now I'm playing the enemy of the state.... but will smith already did that movie--- and denzel washington did a similar movie...and j-lo did the cell and don't forget the cell II. If I were him i'd leave independent filmmaking to spikelee or hype williams unless everyone of us POOR ACTORS is paid fair and able to enjoy life again as we would normally until we're all screaming give US liberty or give us death... in America no matter what film you make LOSS OF HUMAN LIFE can never be replaced...unless we're allowed to turn our capital losses into OUR capital gains.
Hi Roger! While we make creating legal documents easy and affordable, we do not offer a life rights contract. However, we may be able to help you find an attorney who can assist you through our Legal Advantage Plus plan! Please visit https://www.legalzoom.com/attorneys-lawyers/legal-plans/personal.html for more details.
Please note that we can’t answer legal questions in the article comments. If you have a specific legal question, click here to connect with an attorney.