Reply to comment

My brother in law was stopped & detained outside his uncles house that he had been lookim after snce the uncle was admirtted into longterm care facility for those with Alzhimers. The stated they were there looking for his wife they calaimed she had a warrent with a 4way search clause. He was not even in front of the residence he was down the block 3 hoiuses from the residence in question. They stated since she had a warrent that was all the probable cause they needed 2 conduct for them 2 conduct a complete search of the premise according 2 her 4 way search clause. NEITHER OF THEM LIVE THERE IN YHE HOUSE THE POLICE CLAIM THEY DID THEY WERE LOOKING AFTER IT IS OPEN 2 SEARCH AT ANYTIME ACCORDING TO THE TERMS OF PROBATION. YET THIS WAS NOT THE ADDRES PROBATION HAD 4 HER AS THIS WASNT HER HOME. NOW EVEN THOUGH SHE WAS NO ERE AROUND THE HOME, NOT EVEN IN THE SAME CITY, THE STILL USED HER INFORMAL PROBATION AS THE REASON THEY WERE GOING 2 CONDUCT THE SEARCH. WATS EVEN MORE PUZZELING IS HER HUSBAND WASNT EVEN IN THE HOUSE NOR THE YARD OR ANYOTHER PART OF THE PROPERTY BELONGING 2 HIS UNCLE, AND HE ALSO STATED THAT IT WANTS NOT HIS RESIDENCE AND HE HAD NEVER BEEN ANYTHING OTHER THEN HIS UNCLES GUEST IN HIS HOME NEVER A RESIDANT IT WAS NEVER MORE THEN STABLE MAILING ADDRES FOR HIM SINCE THERE WERE MANY TIMES HE DIDNT HAVE 1 OF HIS OWN.

HE HAD BEEN OUT OF TROUBLE OVER 3 YEARS, I KNOW ITW NOT LONG BUT ITS A START ADN EVERY1 HAS 2 START SOMEWHERE...

SO IS IT LEGAL 2 SEARCH A RESIDENCE NOT OWNED NOR RENTED BY NEITHER PARTY YET THEY WERE THE REASON FOR THE SEARCH???

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.