Reply to comment

A useful description except for the fact that it cites the Schmeiser case as an example of "inadvertent" infringement. Three court decisions proved otherwise. How can a crop of Canola be 95% "inadvertently" cross-pollinated with the pollen of a patented plant? http://scc.lexum.org/en/2004/2004scc34/2004scc34.pdf

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.