On the day after Thanksgiving, while some munch on turkey and pie leftovers, others take advantage of Black Friday sales at stores all over the country to finish their Christmas or Hanukkah shopping. Some make plans for Kwanzaa parties or winter solstice celebrations. Others make no plans at all.
In a country as large and diverse as the United States, and one that was founded on the principles of religious freedom, religions and spiritual practices abound. The religious faiths found in the U.S. include Evangelical and Mainline Christian, Catholic, Orthodox Christian (Greek and Russian), Jewish, Mormon, Muslim, Buddhist, Sikh, Hindu and Jehovah’s Witnesses. A large percentage of people are unaffiliated with any religion, calling themselves agnostic, atheist or nothing in particular. With such a diverse population and the desire to not offend anyone, the months of November and December can create a challenge. Should we wish people Merry Christmas or Happy Holidays? How do we strike a balance between enjoying the merriment of the Christmas season and respecting others’ religious beliefs? What exactly is freedom of religion?
While deciding how to wish people a happy holidays comes down to personal choice, employers, government agencies and teachers must be especially careful about how they represent, celebrate and require participation in holidays to ensure they do not infringe on anyone’s right to freedom of religion. That means, holiday parties, public displays, school lessons and more must all take into consideration the law that protects the right to religious freedom.
Below is a case that highlights when an employer crosses the line, and some guidelines on preventing discrimination in the workplace, tips for planning holiday activities in schools and restrictions on the public display of nativity scenes.
Religion & Employment – EEOC v. Belk, Inc.
Charged with enforcing federal laws against employment discrimination, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) filed a federal lawsuit against Belk, Inc., the largest department store in the nation, for religious discrimination. According to a press release by the EEOC, “Department store chain Belk, Inc. unlawfully discriminated against an employee by failing to accommodate her religious beliefs and discharging her because of her religion.” The former employee, Myra Jones-Abid, is a Jehovah’s Witness and her religion forbids her from celebrating holidays, including Christmas. It’s alleged that at the end of November 2008, while working in the gift wrap section of the store, Jones-Abid was told to wear a Santa hat and apron, which was to be worn by all employees doing gift wrap during the Christmas holiday season. She told her employers that she could not wear these items based on her religious belief and was fired.
EEOC attorney Lynette Barnes said, “In this case, the employer refused to provide a simple accommodation to enable Ms. Jones-Abid to practice her sincerely held religious belief and keep her job. An employee should not be forced to choose between her faith and her job.”
Religious Discrimination in the Workplace
The EEOC website gives some guidelines on how to prevent discrimination in the workplace based on religion.
The First Amendment – Religion & Schools
“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof...”
This passage from the Constitution is the source of our rights to freedom of religion. These sixteen words have been the source of countless discussions, debates, writings, laws, regulations and litigation.
The First Amendment Center put together consensus guidelines drafted and endorsed by 17 religious and educational groups regarding religious holidays and public education. The guidelines note in particular that it’s a common misconception that it is permissible to promote Christianity at Christmas, provided that other religions receive similar treatment at other times. “[O]ne violation of the First Amendment does not justify another. … [T]eachers should work to ensure that all holiday activities focus on objective study about religion, not indoctrination.”
According to the guidelines, teachers and administrators may want to consider three questions when planning holiday activities.
Christmas Law – Government Sponsored Public Displays
An American Civil Liberties Union website article discusses some of the major legal issues surrounding Christmas and the First Amendment when it comes to public displays. Generally, a nativity scene or stand-alone crèche is not permitted when sponsored by the government, because it has the effect of endorsing a Christian message, the birth of Christ.
However, if the crèche is just one part of a larger holiday display with things that are not religious, like reindeer, candy canes, Santa Claus and Christmas trees, which are considered secular, then it will probably be permissible.
In most interactions between individuals, a simple “Happy Holidays” is acceptable. After all, we could all use more peace on the earth and good will.
Sources:
NRF Forecasts Holiday Sales Increase of 2.3 Percent, October 6, 2010
The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life
Belk, Inc. Sued by EEOC for Religious Discrimination, July 29, 2010
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Laws, Regulations, & Guidance: Religious Discrimination
First Amendment Center: About The First Amendment
Religious Holidays: A First Amendment Guide, February 15, 2010
I fail to see the firing of the lady at Belk,Inc. just because she refused protocal of the Santa hat. As you say later on in your article Santa Claus is s secular item. One may be under the law but this is either wrong or one has to accept that Santa may be Jesus on Christmas Eve. Let me know your thoughts...thanks john
Perhaps her personal belief is that considers her religious belief, like some people don't ware jewelry and many jobs don't allow shirts with logos or images.
She needed to explain her position before the event came up. that would have saved a lot of hassle. Conforming to the company's image of holiday cheer is important. Company policy should be considered first, I think.
The First Amendment has been over interpreted to the degree that it curtails freedom of religious expression in the public square, school and even in some cases in residential developments by covenants. Just as any other community moral issue contemplated by the founding fathers, these standards are best set by the individual communities in their respective states. Again the one size fits all progressive agenda has homogenized a beautiful expression of religious acknowledgement of the birth of our Savior into a winter solstice celebration and a happy holiday.
"She needed to explain her position before the event came up. that would have saved a lot of hassle." She told them in November - which seems to me to be before. This was no doubt when she learned of the "requirement". Imagine you
are allergic to coffee. At what time should you tell your employer this? At the interview? When others are drinking coffee? No...because it has no bearing on your job and you can't imagine it ever being a condition of employment. One day, howerver, your boss states, next Monday, we are going to have a meeting and everyone WILL drink coffee at the meeting. Then what would you do? You would respectfully (probably in private) inform your boss that you don't drink coffee due to allergies. Do you think you should be fired? Do you think you should have told them sooner in the off-chance that this became a condition of your employment. It would have saved "a lot of hassle", afterall.
Research will bear out that the Winter Solstice celebration (observed before Jesus' birth - which is in October) actually was homogenized into a supposed Christian celebration. What goes around comes around.
Please note that we can’t answer legal questions in the article comments. If you have a specific legal question, click here to connect with an attorney.