Patent Reform: What Inventors Need to Know

-

In a rare show of bipartisanship, the United States Congress moved a sweeping patent reform bill through both houses, approved it in committee and sent it to the President to have it signed into law. On September 16, 2011, President Obama did just that, effecting the first major set of patent reforms in the US in decades. The America Invents Act is truly historic—but what does it mean for the independent inventor? Much. Read on.

The Act does a lot—the Senate version totaled 116 pages, and the House version 140—and covers ground from US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) funding itself, to post-grant review, and everywhere in between. Several sections of the Act are controversial—including the funding portions. But nothing in the Act has provoked more controversy in the inventor’s community than the Act’s shift of the US patent system from “first to invent” to “first inventor to file.” This is seen by many as a seismic shift in the way patents are awarded in this country, and there is wide speculation about the effect it will have on innovation in this country.

Shift from First-to-Invent to First-Inventor-to-File System

Since the federal government began granting patents, America has always been a first-to-invent country. That is to say, the first person to invent a particular thing or process is the one awarded the patent on that invention—regardless of whether someone else beats him or her to the USPTO with an application for that same invention. This has removed a certain amount of urgency in the patent filing process—there is no real “race to the Patent Office,” since the first inventor gets the patent (assuming he or she can prove s/he is truly first). Many other countries use a first-to-file system, and many in the US believe that this difference is what has allowed the US to maintain its position as the world’s leader in innovation.

Well now the world will have a chance to find out if that’s true. “First inventor to file” is really just “first to file,” since no one other than an inventor has ever been allowed to file a patent application. So we’re now looking at that race to the Patent Office that the former system avoided. Invent something but have to go to a friend’s wedding before filing your application? I might beat you to the punch, even if I invented after you—and there’s nothing you can do about it. If you expand your hypothetical competition from me to, let’s say, Apple or Google or Boeing—mega-companies with hundreds or thousands of engineers and inventors on staff—then you’ll start to see the true danger of the Patent Reform Act to the independent inventor. Specifically: Those companies file more patent applications in a day than most independent inventors file in a lifetime. To put it in concrete terms, Apple filed eleven applications on September 1, 2011. So now the independent inventor is racing to the Patent Office against…Apple. The analogies are too cheap to even bother with.

Get to the Front of the Line with a Provisional Application for Patent

So what can you, the independent inventor, do to mitigate the effect of “first inventor to file?” Your number one weapon in this fight is the provisional application for patent. A provisional application allows you to get your invention on file with the USPTO much more quickly, easily and at far less expense than filing a full, non-provisional utility patent application. A provisional application requires no claims—indeed, it has no “formal” requirements at all and is not examined on its merits at all upon receipt—and it holds a place in line for your invention as of the date of its filing. That filing date is preserved for a full year, during which time you can finish fleshing out your invention and work up a great corresponding non-provisional application. When you file that corresponding non-provisional application, your filing date is the date when you filed your provisional application—in other words, you’ve gotten to the USPTO a whole lot faster with your invention.

Let Inventors Keep Innovating

“First inventor to file” carries with it serious concerns for the independent inventor. But don’t let the new system stop you from inventing—the independent inventor has always been and always will be the backbone of American innovation, the poster child for American ingenuity. If you’ve got a brilliant invention and don’t want to see someone who happens to be better capitalized (or just fleeter of foot) than you get the patent that you deserve, get to work on your provisional application for patent and make sure that the first inventor in the race to the Patent Office is you. Because the race is on.

Comments

This politicians should be ashamed of themselves, this gives others a chance to steal other peoples inventions. Disgusting!! That is all I can say.

It is a very disappointing turn of events when "Rare bipartisan" agreement is reached on such a fundamental bastardization of American Ingenuity. If you were ever in doubt who holds the true power in the United States, may your eyes be opened.

Isn't it nice to know we've made it OK to steal, because that is what it is! It kind of gives you that warm and fuzzy feeling doesn't it. I hope everyone is proud to say, it's OK to take what is not ours, take credit for it and make money on it! Will you support this is the real question? Is this our education system that teaches us so well and educates us to live in this nature? Lets think about this for a minute..........Hum ...... can you say, now repeat after me... "class system". At what point did we decide to reward people for bad behaviour? Yes taking credit for work that isn't yours is BAD BEHAIOUR, YES IT IS, and it should not be rewarded just because you have a quicker access to a process. Wake up PLEASE!!! Do you realize that the cream doesn't rise to the top in a environment like this. Only the thieves rise up. If you were a song writer and were playing a song you just wrote and I heard it as I walked by and recorded it on my phone... is it OK for me to copyright it and make money on it without you, just because I have a quicker access. Don't let things like this stand, we will all pay the price for it. Even if a law says it's OK to steal, it's still stealing. Can you say ethics

what is the cost to file a provisional application?

Hi I am CEO of Prosperous Ink and I am interested in setting up a meeting for a provisional patent. If you could email me back with more info that would be great thank you.

What is the total COST of an official patent for a new product idea from beginning to end and what is the time line.
What is the BEST way to merchandize it......and with whom can I trust to do so?

Dear S. Maloney,

Please visit http://www.legalzoom.com/trademarks-patents-copyrights/patent-overview.html to start your research on the patenting process. Our Education Center and FAQs can give you a lot of the information you'll need to answer your questions. LegalZoom provides a number of valuable patent-related services, including search, provisional applications and full utility applications.

There are companies that claim to work with inventors to help them merchandise and monetize their inventions. LegalZoom does not endorse any of them.

As far as timelines, please visit www.USPTO.gov and check their "patents dashboard" to see their current figures on how long the patenting process can take.

Best of luck, and we hope we can serve your patent needs in the future.

Thanks for all the great comments.

There's no doubt that the Act is going to cause some uncertainty in the patent community for some time to come. To be fair, there are some provisions that should help the independent inventor--like micro-entity pricing, should it wind up being approved and implemented. But there are aspects that inventors and other patent practitioners are going to need to learn and know cold--like the "prior disclosure" changes to Section 102, just for example.

What's certain, though, is the increased importance of the provisional application. Inventors will be wise to get their affairs in order to file provisional applications for their inventions soon as they can.

We live interesting times, to be sure.

It will be very interesting to see the effects this has as it is rolled out.

This is a very important issue as we're looking out over the current jobs landscape and people start to explore their options as entrepreneurs.

Moreover, it is impressive that both houses passed this Bipartisan bill, yet it received very little press coverage.

How do protect your blogging IP?

I want to read and know more details about the Micro Entity Status provision in the new law. What detailed explanation
can you provide or can I read. thank you.

Hi Brian! Thanks for contacting LegalZoom. LegalZoom makes creating legal documents easy and affordable, but since we're not a law firm, we can't give specific legal advice regarding this situation. However, you can get free legal advice on the LegalZoom Facebook page every Friday and Tuesday. Check out Free Joe: http://zoo.mn/FreeJoe.



Please note that we can’t answer legal questions in the article comments. If you have a specific legal question, click here to connect with an attorney.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.