When former “Superman” actor Jackie Cooper died, the media latched on to a short section in his will that would essentially disinherit anyone who dared challenge the document: the “poison pill” clause. While these types of provisions have been around for quite a while—even Michael Jackson had one in his living trust—they’re not always enforceable or even advisable.
In fact, because poison pill clauses are a rather confusing legal issue with so many wrinkles, their use—especially in broad general terms—is discouraged by many legal professionals.
What’s a Poison Pill Clause in a Will?
The proper legal term is a “no contest clause,” and its purpose is to discourage people from challenging the provisions of a living trust or will.
Generally, a poison pill clause provides that anyone who contests the will or trust would receive a paltry sum, often one dollar. The potential penalty is considered the “poison” that would kill the beneficiary’s chances of receiving a larger inheritance. In legal-speak, such a provision is also called an “in terrorem” clause as its intent is to scare potential heirs out of fighting for a bigger chunk of the estate.
Disinheriting Someone vs. Inserting a Poison Pill Clause
If the testator would like to disinherit someone entirely, he or she can expressly do so in the will without a no contest clause. On the other hand, if a person is omitted from a will that also contains a no contest clause, he or she really has no reason not to challenge the will as there's nothing to lose either way.
Accordingly, where there is a no contest clause, it's advisable to leave something for each beneficiary—arguably something enough to convince them that it's not worth losing over a will contest. Indeed, Beverly Hills attorney Randy Spiro, specifically suggests “mak[ing] a gift to the heir (e.g. one of the children) that is large enough to cause the heir to worry that the risk of losing what he or she has been given is simply not worth it.”
Are Poison Pill Clauses Enforceable?
Whether a no contest clause is enforceable depends on the state in which the will or trust is executed. In many jurisdictions, no contest clauses are indeed enforceable, but are often interpreted quite strictly, which means they may not end up being enforced if challenged.
The reasoning behind this strictness is because the enforcement of such a clause results in the forfeiture of property as well as other rights—consequences not to be taken lightly. Indeed, states that have outlawed no contest clauses altogether, such as Florida, tend to follow this public policy reasoning.
Sections 2-517 (wills) and 3-905 (trusts) of the Uniform Probate Code, however, do allow for no contest clauses unless the person challenging the will or trust has probable cause to do so:
A provision in a will purporting to penalize an interested person for contesting the will or instituting other proceedings relating to the estate is unenforceable if probable cause exists for instituting proceedings.
Several states have adopted this provision with the probable cause exception, especially since courts don't want to discourage litigation if there is a genuine concern that a testator lacked capacity or a beneficiary exhibited undue influence on the testator.
Meanwhile, other states continue to tweak their approaches to no contest clauses. California, for example, recently passed a law that came into effect in January of 2010, laying down strict rules as to when such clauses would be enforceable. Before that, most poison pill clauses would have been enforceable in the Golden State.
Just because a state permits no contest clauses, though, doesn't mean the provisions will always stand up in court. To the contrary, complicated legal questions may then arise, including whether the clause was validly incorporated into the will/trust as well as what actions constitute a “contest,” which some states define and others don't. Such decisions are made on a case-by-case basis and based on an application of state law.
Final Thoughts on Poison Pill Clauses
Poison pill clauses are full of nuances and potential unintended consequences—and on top of that, this area of law is constantly changing. Accordingly, make sure you read up on the warning labels about poison pill clauses before you decide to incorporate one into your last will and testament.
Delaware Chancery Court very rarely, if ever, overturns a will that is contested. Even if the heir can prove undue influence they believe that testators have 'moments of clarity' and therefore can leave all their possessions to someone who was hired to care for them. Even if your parents had the same will for 60 years and suddenly in their late 80s decide to leave everything to non-family. Delawaware chancery court believes this is what they wanted. You have no idea it's happened and they make sure you never do. This includes property such as every picture of a child and their family and all family heirlooms that the undue influencer would have no possible interest in keeping. You'll find these family heirlooms sold at garage sales and on eBay.
It is YOUR responsibilty to make sure your parents are not being robbed by their hired help, having their mail sent to another address, and planning their own retirement at the detriment of your elderly parents, especially if they do not live close to you.
The economic environment has bred a type of criminal that is desperate, will stop at nothing, and knows the legal system in their state enough to be dangerous. Remember, they have all the time in the world to prepare their case for court because they know you will contest. However, YOU have nothing because you weren't aware of what was happening while your parent was alive and it's nearly impossible to recreate what happened once they've passed on. The criminal will win in every case because the Delaware chancery court judges have no balls and would rather clear their docket in one day then have you try to prove that your parent was manipulated.
You know, they could have had all the money. We just wanted our family photos, furniture, heirlooms, and our children's memories.
Please, please don't lose sight of your parents' welfare and think you've hired just the right person to care for them. They go through their mail, find out how much they are worth, and begin spinning a scenario where they will become heirs because they are the only person(s) in the world who care for your parents.
Please note that we can’t answer legal questions in the article comments. If you have a specific legal question, click here to connect with an attorney.