The Pros and Cons of Registering Photo and Music Copyrights as a Collection or Group

For a prolific artist, photographer or musician, trying to register a copyright for each creative piece separately can be expensive and time-consuming. The option to protect entire collections of work as a group offers enticing savings in time and cost. But this option comes with important restrictions every artist needs to be aware of.

Find out more about Copyrights

Trustpilot star rating bar
the pros and cons of registering photo and music copyrights as a collection or group

Contents

Updated on: March 21, 2023
Read time: 5 min

In the Internet age, where digital music and image files are easily shared, copyright protection is critical for musicians, photographers, and digital artists. Even though the filing fees for copyright registration are relatively inexpensive, for a prolific musician or photographer who creates dozens or even hundreds of songs or photos, those fees can add up. Artists who can't afford to register every work may opt to register only some, leaving others without the benefits of federal registration, but the U.S. Copyright Office offers artists another alternative: registration of a group or collection of many works under a single registration. This option allows an artist to register more works for significantly reduced filing fees than registering each work separately. But artists need to be aware that this approach comes with certain limitations.

Not all photos or songs are eligible to be grouped together in a group registration. Although the rules vary slightly with respect to different types of works, generally speaking, works may be grouped together in a single registration only if they all have the same publication status and the same owner or author(s). However, some of these concepts have a special meaning under U.S. Copyright law.

  • Publication. According to U.S. Copyright law, a creative work is deemed to have a status of “published” if it has been distributed to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, such as lease, license, or rental, or if it has been at least offered for transfer. However—and this is an important point—a public display of a work without a transfer of ownership or offer to transfer ownership does not constitute publication. Thus, offering a song for sale on the iTunes Store or a website is considered publication, but uploading a photo to Flickr or other photo sharing site is not … unless the site offers the work for sale, lease, rental or licensing. That's an important distinction every artist needs to understand.
  • Copyright owner. The owner of a copyrighted work is the person or entity that holds the right to allow or disallow transfer or duplication of the work. This is usually the author, artist, or musician who created the work, but not always. A work created by an employee as part of his or her job duties is typically owned by the company. The copyright owner could also be an entity to whom an artist has assigned or transferred ownership rights, as in the case of musicians who transfer rights to a record label through a recording contract.
  • Author. The author of a copyrighted work is the person or persons who created the work, except in cases where an employee creates a work as part of his or her job duties. However, each and every person who makes a creative contribution to a work is a co-owner of the work. This issue does not often arise in the context of photography and other visual arts, but in music, all members of a band who contribute to the writing or performance of a song may be co-owners if there is no contract or employment arrangement that would transfer those rights.

Group registration: What qualifies, what doesn't

With these definitions in mind, let's look at the specific rules for the group registration of photographs and musical works. If the works have not been published, the rules are the same for photos and songs:

A group of unpublished photographs or songs may be filed for copyright registration in a single group registration if:

  • All of the photos or songs have the same author, or, in the case of multiple authors, all of the works have at least one author in common.
  • All of the photos or songs have the same copyright owner.

If the works have been published, the rules differ slightly for photos and songs.

A group of published photographs may be filed in a single group registration if:

  • All of the photos were taken by the same photographer. Note that this requirement differs from the question of authorship. While a company that employs multiple photographers may be considered the author of all of the photos from a legal standpoint, for purposes of group copyright registration, each group of photographs must be the work of a single photographer.
  • All of the photos were published in the same calendar year.
  • All of the photos have the same copyright owner.

A group of published songs may be filed in a single group registration if:

All of the songs have the same copyright owner. As discussed above, co-ownership issues that arise in the context of a musical band with multiple contributors can severely complicate these issues. Accordingly, many experienced entertainment attorneys advise bands to form an LLC or corporation to manage their copyrights or to have a “work for hire” agreement in place to centralize copyright ownership.

The advantages of a group registration should be fairly obvious: significant cost savings on filing fees and significant time savings in the preparation of copyright applications. However, major record labels still typically file each song on an album as a separate registration. This is because filing multiple works under a single group registration potentially limits the copyright owner's remedies if those rights are infringed.

Most copyright infringement cases related to music or visual works are filed by major companies. But whether or not you can afford to pursue a lawsuit, the issue of potential remedies is relevant because it can mean the difference between a cease and desist, or settlement demand that has “teeth” and one that doesn't. That's because U.S. Copyright law provides for statutory damages if a copyright owner proves that there has been an infringement of a registered work. If a registered work is infringed, the copyright owner is entitled to recover up to $150,000 in statutory damages even if the copyright owner cannot prove how much the infringement has cost him or her.

The prospect of having to pay statutory damages along with the copyright owner's attorney fees can make a very compelling argument to cease infringement and agree to a monetary settlement. Unfortunately, the law allows only one statutory damages award per registration, regardless of how many infringements have occurred. That means that if an entire album of music is copied without permission, the owner who registered each song separately could seek fifteen statutory damages awards, while one who had filed a group registration for the album could only seek one award.

In this way, an artist's registration strategy can help impact the persuasiveness of a settlement demand and potentially the settlement value of the copyright owner's claim. Of course, an independent artist or small business cannot always afford that kind of protection. But in all cases, having a federal copyright registration is more effective in preventing and stopping infringement than not having one. All artists should carefully consider the costs and benefits of the group registration mechanism before deciding on a strategy for protecting valuable intellectual property.

You should discuss any copyright questions or issues with an attorney specializing in intellectual property law. Websites such as LegalZoom can help you find an attorney. In addition, LegalZoom's Business Legal Plan offers its subscribers one free copyright registration per month (excluding government filing fees).

Find out more about CopyrightsStart Now
Twitter logoFacebook logoLinkedIn logoReddit logo

This article is for informational purposes. This content is not legal advice, it is the expression of the author and has not been evaluated by LegalZoom for accuracy or changes in the law.

58 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Obtaining a Copyright

I had some questions about copyright, and he answered all of them. He was pleasant to talk to very professional. I was very pleased. I've been using legalzoom for many years, and I love you guys. Thank you.

NORINA PURRO
59 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Happy customer

Ms. Green, was very helpful in assisting me step-by-step in guiding through the process in getting my copyright application. She was patient and very polite. She offered to follow-up on my completed, make sure the process was successful.

Ayesha
65 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Superior Customer Service

Superior customer service and expertise from Patti Green. I have a urgent need for an attorney consultation regarding state level copyright law. Ms. Green quickly and seamlessly steered me to the plan which affords this service. The consult was immediately scheduled for the next day. To say the least, this experience was exemplary.

Guy Hampson
70 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Copyright registration

Karen helped me immensely during my copyright registration. Very patient. Carrie was alos very good over there.

rjparadee
114 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

So far whenever I have tried to work…

So far whenever I have tried to work with Legal Zoom it has been a great experience. Both Holly and Denise have helped to make my tour of the legal process for a copyright excellent and I now have my copyright in my hands. I might add that I am amazed I got it under the oligarchy at all after doge got done.

Connie Lednum
108 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Great Copyright Registration Experience

Walked me through the process to register my copyright. Made everything quick and easy!

Cheryl C
127 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Your expertise and knowledge of my…

Your expertise and knowledge of my questions regarding my copyright I applied for was nothing less than stellar!

Lorenzo Vito
154 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Time and clarity

Thank you for your time and clarity explaining items from my behalf in regards to Copyright material. I also appreciate the no queue waiting on line when I called. I do recommend you.

Adriant Sanchez
162 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Elizabeth was AMAZING!!!

Elizabeth was AMAZING!!!, She walk me thru the whole copyright process. Thank you

Adewale Agboke Jr
170 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Very responsive and was able to answer…

Very responsive and was able to answer my questions about Copyright options quickly and professionally.

Daniel White
325 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Great customer service

Great customer service! The LegalZoom representative showed genuine care. She followed up on my Copyright Order, and remembered me and my name from the previous Copyright phone call. She was very helpful and represented LegalZoom with excellence. Thank you for hiring, and retaining such a talented energetic representative.

Joshua Earl
566 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Legal Zoom Delivers On Their Promises!

Legal Zoom is professional, accommodating, and gracious. We went to them for copyright help, and true to their promise, we accomplished this endeavor in 30 minutes. EASY!! What a fresh breath of air to find a company that delivers exactly what they say they will! We'll be a Legal Zoomers for life!

Alice Osborne
1205 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Better than "Uncle Sam"

I had to get a copyright done and got nowhere with the U.S. Government Copyright Office, it was a joke! Legal Zoom took care of it and had me "fixed up" in 5 minutes. Thank You, Legal Zoom!

Padu
1311 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Legal Zoom performance is exceptional

Legal Zoom his handled four copyright applications for me and they are exceptional.

C Robert Cales
1588 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

Copyright application

I am a new author and am filing copyright for my manuscript. My experience with LegalZoom has been very successful and a pleasure. The associate was knowledgeable and a pleasure to work with. I would recommend this service.

DJS
1749 days ago
Trustpilot star rating bar

LegalZoom's Guidance is the best

I'm applying for a copyright for the first time and I was very nervous. My status page told me there was a problem and I should call LegalZoom. Kirk explained it was just a simple confirmation that was needed and he took the time to explain why its needed and talked me through what happens next. LegalZoom is just the best thing for a first time business owner like myslef.

rjlog
Rated4.6out of 5 based on23,956+ reviewson

Showing our favorite reviews